There are a lot of names that have been used to define the “establishment” politicians of the Republican party. Neocon, and RINO, seem to be the most used. The latter being an abbreviation for “Republican In Name Only”. Of course, these go under the assumption that “republican” and “conservative” are synonymous. To me, that’s simply not the case.
Let me go ahead and define my definition of “Conservative” and “Liberal” before I move on…
As I see it, the terms liberal and conservative refer to the creation and application of laws. Meaning, do you create and apply laws in generous amounts, or are you more discerning in the laws you create, keeping them to the bare minimum? Of course, this is based off my study of history and the early stages of our government.
It would seem as though this has been perverted and construed to mean personal values. In that, you have to believe a certain way to be associated with said party. Some more benign examples could be a “liberal” who likes guns or a “conservative” who is pro gay marriage. More caustic examples would be “blacks and women should only be liberals” and “the conservative party is for old white men”.
Of course, none of that is truly the case. I have many friends that go against those “traditional” roles. Again, I don’t believe they are traditional definitions, but more so modern perversions to fit a narrative.
This leads me to my point about being a “RINO”. I’m conservative, sure, but only within the confines of the definition mentioned previously. The problem is that the republican party continues to get further and further from those values, and while they suggest they have the more modern values of conservatism, they really do little to support those claims.
So, I am a “Republican in name only”. I hope that my vote can help bring the party back into line with my beliefs. I’d like them to represent me, but I don’t know if that will ever happen. It may be that I have to switch parties to one more in line with my beliefs, which I’d prefer to not have to do.
This is the problem with partisan politics and the 2 party system. There is nothing good that comes from it.
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. -George Washington
Boy were our founding fathers ahead of their time…
Here we are, 68 days into Donald Trump’s presidency, and it seems as though the pace is moving very well. So, why then, do people try to live in the past?
I’m not talking about any specific party. I’m talking about people who continue to complain about Obama, those who post about Trump’s missteps during the campaign, the messages about the random celebrity who said this or that. All things that were reported on ad nauseam, either positively or negatively.
You still see birthers blathering on about Obama’s birth certificate. You still see meme’s about Will Smith saying that Trump supporters should leave the country. The list goes on and on. And why?
Well, since you’re still here reading this then you care what I think, so I’ll tell you what I believe. I believe that there are people who can’t handle being happy or content. There are people who love the misery of hatred. It’s these people who have no real argument or debate, so they just push their vitriol on others any chance they get.
These are the same people who tend to be uneducated, and speak in very small words while name calling in an effort to make themselves feel superior. They’re buzz words when trying to debate are “moron” and “stupid” and “idiot” and … The list goes on.
I used to waste my time trying to talk sensibly with them, only to find that it was a lesson in futility. I don’t do this any longer, which probably gives those individuals a sense of victory. A sense that they have stuck it to their enemy. It probably also reinforces their belief in whatever tired diatribe their spewing. Unfortunately, the negative effects of this aren’t enough for me to continue to put myself through the headache of trying to convey my position in an intuitive manner to someone who is incapable of logical or rational thought.
I am somewhat exhausted; I wonder how a battery feels when it pours electricity into a non-conductor?― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Adventure of the Dying Detective
As a quick follow-up to my previous post, I just watched the president’s statements surrounding the failure. I find it ridiculous to blame the democrats for the failure of the healthcare debacle. This is a failure of the GOP, entirely. There was more than one plan put forward that would have helped greatly, but instead the establishment representatives in the GOP backed the Ryan bill.
That bill, as stated previously, was a travesty. It was known for some time it wouldn’t pass. It’s worth saying again that congress is defunct, on both sides, and has been that way for some time. If nothing changes in short order, the GOP will see the same losses in 2018 that the democrats saw after passing the ACA.
I’m also hugely disappointed in Trump. I feel that he’s rolling over. I don’t care what he says about “letting it blow up”, it’s his job to work for the people and simply placing blame and moving on is the easy way out. That is not how a leader gets things done. It’s also not a “win” for the American people. Very disappointed indeed.
So, today the Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare) replacement bill died.
I’m still digesting it. It wasn’t unexpected, there were a lot of clues leading up to this with all of the in-fighting, all of the disagreement of keep and amend vs repeal and replace, but I’m surprised none the less. I’m surprised that after 7 years the establishment candidates within congress were incapable of presenting intelligent legislation that not only stops the massive negative impact of the current bill, but also improves upon the positive aspects. At the very least they could have repealed it entirely to stop the bleeding. That is what the people wanted. The people spoke numerous times, through no less than 3 elections.
Instead, our government, and more pointedly the GOP, has proven that they are defunct. This has been relatively apparent for the past few years, but seems to be getting exponentially worse. They are the reason that our previous president spoke about having a phone and a pen, and they are the reason why there is quite a bit of unrest throughout the country today.
Maybe it’s by design. Maybe it’s because they want the country at odds with each other to keep from having any real focus places on their inefficacy. Distraction can be a powerful tool.
I think that they’re probably underestimating what happened during the last election, and are in for a rude awakening in 2018. As I see it, the people spoke loudly with the “tea party” movement, and started by giving the house to the GOP. The subsequent election yielded the senate. All the while, the GOP said that it was the presidents fault. What they neglected to see, or maybe they don’t care, is that the entire time more and more people started paying attention. Now they have the house, the senate, and the presidency, and the expectation is that they will “get things done”.
Healthcare was a major factor in how people voted. This isn’t a secret, the people have spoken out many times. Think about it, the first loss that came about was after the ACA was signed into law against the will of the majority of the country. It’s with this in mind that I believe their decision to not take this seriously was a big mistake. I believe they will reap what they’ve sown and will be losing seats in the upcoming election.
That is, of course, if they don’t get themselves together and start performing. There is still time. Yes, I’ve talked about the 2018 elections, but we’re only 3 months into 2017 so there’s still time. I’m not optimistic, and don’t hold out much hope. I’ve simply been burnt too many times. Nonetheless there is still time.
Inside of every problem lies an opportunity. – Robert Kiyosaki
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, castaway on some remote island with no access to media, or have some other reason for not interacting with society, you’ve seen the bathroom gender issue rear its ugly head. You know the one I’m talking about, where it has been ordered that a person can use the bathroom of the gender that they identify with.
To be clear, I believe that this was nothing more than an desire to receive special recognition. Prior to all the hubbub, I’m certain that I’ve used the bathroom with gay people. There’s even the likelihood that I’ve shared the bathroom with a transgendered person. I know that my wife and daughter have experienced the same. All without any unwanted advances or altercations, and all without the need of a new law or special recognition.
You see, prior to the latest manufactured outrage, the bathroom was simply a place to do your business, and any outwardly creepy person (of either gender) would be reported. People who identified as a man and even remotely looked like a man used the men’s room. People who identified as a woman and even remotely looked like a woman (and sometimes not really) used the ladies room. No muss, no fuss, no harm, no foul.
Fast forward to today. The Indiana legislature is now putting forth legislation requiring people to utilize the bathroom of the gender on their birth certificate. Prior to this there was, as far as I know, no law that said you had to utilize any specific bathroom. Now I will say that this does not account for schools and their policies where children and their genders are pretty well known, but I’ll leave that for a separate discussion as I believe that goes far beyond simple bathroom use.
So, what you have here is an unintended consequence. Where prior to pushing for the special recognition you had the ability to do exactly what you wanted as long as you weren’t a moron, and now (assuming the legislation passes and moves through the states) you’ll be actually breaking a law. Is that the outcome they sought? I don’t think so.
I’m sure that the 15 minutes of fame was worth actually impacting people who simply wanted to live their lives. I don’t think they’d agree, but then again it was never your point to help them, was it?
Without reflection, we go blindly on our way, creating more unintended consequences, and failing to achieve anything useful. – Margaret J. Wheatley
For the first two years of the Obama presidency, the democratic party had control of the house and the senate, much like the Republicans do today. While in control the only noteworthy accomplishment, regardless of how damaging it turned out to be, was the affordable care act. Beyond that, there wasn’t anything else done. That is, in my opinion, what caused them to lose the house after 2 years, the senate after 4 years, and the presidency after 8.
As time went on there was a lot of hub-bub about obstructionism, when they were actually trying to push unfavorable legislation that the majority of the populace was against, causing their representatives to oppose it. (Yes, I know that was a run-on sentence). The point being that they had tons of opportunity to create legislation that was agreeable to the masses, that benefited the people and the country, and that would have been passed. They failed to do so, and they suffered the consequences.
The bottom line is that pet projects that only help a small subset of the populace are a bad idea. They’re even worse if they infringe on the liberty of others, which many of the things that were being pushed did.
So, now we have a Republican controlled presidency, house, and senate. The President won based on some strong promises that didn’t necessarily toe the party line. The house and senate gained seats. This was all, in my opinion, a mandate that the “status quo” would not be tolerated any longer.
I believe that Trump sees that we need to pass meaningful and unobtrusive laws, and remove laws that are senseless, obtrusive, and go against the liberty of the people. His actions thus far seem to back up his claims.
It would appears as though there are some in the senate who are ingrained in the establish mentality, and wish to maintain the status quo. This will be detrimental to their “party” lead. Unfortunately, they have been re-elected many times (MANY times), so it would seem as though they have no motivation to change their ways.
The house seems to be less of a quagmire, likely due to the more frequent turn over. That’s not to say there aren’t any obstructionists in the house, just that I believe there are fewer and that things can move through the house at a quicker pace.
At this point, America has the opportunity to see a government shed the skin of complacency and act on behalf of the people and the country. It won’t be easy. It won’t be fun. It won’t be painless. What it could be is the foundation for an era of prosperity for America unlike anything we’ve seen before. It will take work and sacrifice, but it would be oh so worth it.
So, I urge our representatives, Republican and Democrat alike, to stand up for America and do what is right and just. Don’t squander this opportunity you have been given, and protect our country and the values of our founding fathers. Uphold the liberty and justice as you pledge to do. Protect the constitution as is your sworn duty. Make the hard decisions. The people, and remember you are one of us, will be rewarded.
A wise man will make more opportunities than he finds. ― Francis Bacon, The Essays
It would seem that every time you turn on the television lately that all you see is reporting on Russia. There is creative editing and narrative creation. Something similar happened during the previous administration, albeit with a very different outcome in mind.
Fortunately, while this was going on during the prior administration I was forced to look for the truth of what was going on while they were trying to distract me. You understand, while they are focused on a single narrative, many things happen on a daily basis that go unseen my the masses. That is, of course, unless you go looking for the information.
I have to wonder, would all of those who are outraged about the Russian issues change their tune regarding the president if they knew what was actually going on “behind the curtain”? The curtain that is the main stream media. What if they actually knew of how the agenda was being implemented? What if they agreed with some of the things going on? What if they found out about something they really disagreed with? The latter is definitely something that struck me during the previous administration.
I’m sure that for the liberal and progressive out there, there’s plenty to be upset about. Things that actually need to be addressed. Unfortunately very few know about it because the current environment in the media is an echo chamber for them, so they feel no need to look further.
I guess this turned into another anti-mainstream media post, even though it wasn’t the initial intent. They just make it so easy. No, the point was supposed to convince you that you should look at multiple sources, and realize that when tons of focus and effort is put into driving you to follow one thing, you should be concerned about what is going on behind the scenes.
This plays into a previous post about educating yourself. It is your responsibility to search out the information. It’s your responsibility to ask questions. It’s your responsibility to make logical, rational, informed, and educated decisions.
So, I implore you to “pay attention to that man behind the curtain”. Understand what is going on. Get involved. Get engaged.
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. -Martin Luther King, Jr.
I follow news organizations from representing the entire spectrum of political ideologies. I even read articles from the biggest culprits perpetrating “fake news”. I also tend to read some of the comments. This is where my apparent masochistic tendencies come in to play.
I seem to read the comments on the more liberal articles to see just what it is that the “other side” thinks. While some of them can be pretty tame, the vast majority seem to fall in the “triggered” category. It would seem as though all reason and logic is thrown out the window to be replaced by the cult like talking points. You know the ones, they are chanted at rallies, spewed by the MSM ad nauseum to get their point across, and have no basis in fact.
Then you have the wholly uneducated, who believe that the big word they are regurgitating means something completely different. Words like tyranny, oppression, equality, etc. These are the ones who really tend to “get my goat”.
In the past I’ve tried to question the poster to see if maybe I’m misunderstanding what they are saying. I’ve even simply corrected them and provided the actual definition to show that they’re not conveying their point correctly. In all but a very few cases, the ability of the author to form a coherent sentence dissolves and they resort to spewing spewing derogatory epithets.
So, I’ve come to the realization that I need to learn where to draw the line? I’ve found more and more lately that I’ll start to type up a response only to delete it as I’ve realized it’ll be a lesson in futility. Is that the right thing to do? I can’t answer that. I will say that it was the catalyst for this blog. Rather than argue on the internet I can opine, and should anyone want to discuss or debate the topic with me in a cordial manner, I am readily available.
So, where do you draw the line? Should I go back to debating in the comments section? I don’t think so, it may make my brain explode.
The latest buzzphrase (new word, you heard it here first) is “Equality for all”. This is on the back of the “trans-gendered” bathroom issue that was recently addressed by the Trump administration. I’ll get into my thoughts about that in a bit, but for now I’d like to address the lack of “equality” that the statement conveys.
The definition of equality is:
the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities:
“an organization aiming to promote racial equality”
synonyms: fairness · equal rights · equal opportunities · equity · egalitarianism · [more]
The feelings of those people who align with their true gender are not being given “equal” consideration. Note, I did indeed say true gender. While I have no problem with L, G, B, T, or Q individuals, gender is a scientific term and cannot be remolded simply because it doesn’t fit the narrative. You’d think the same people touting climate “science” would understand that. Therefore, it’s a given that biologically there are only two genders, and only very rarely do the two come in the same package.
I state that to shed some light on my overall belief, which is that they are not looking for “equality” at all. These arguments are geared toward obtaining special recognition. Furthermore, they look to the powers that be to give them this special recognition and consider it a “win” for their ego, even though it’s simply unnecessary. Why are their feelings any more important than anyone else’s? In my opinion it contradicts liberty as a whole.
In all honesty, I believe that they are making much ado about nothing. In my time on this earth I’d imagine I’ve, at the very least, shared a restroom with a gay person. I can actually say that with certainty. I’d also imagine that my wife and children have as well. I can’t speak with certainly about the trans-gendered community, but it wouldn’t be surprising. The only way that would be readily apparent would be if a woman who looked like a woman tried to go in the men’s restroom, or vice versa. Otherwise we just don’t pay that much attention.
Why, then, do people need special consideration? The answer is they don’t unless they are trying to do something nefarious. If you’re just going to the bathroom, then go, do your business and get out. If your argument is that you don’t want to be in the bathroom with someone of a gender you don’t identify with, then you need to take into consideration that people of the gender you identify with don’t care about your identity and don’t want to be in the bathroom with someone of a different gender.
Of course, there’s a simple solution. Going forward make all bathrooms unisex single user units with full enclosure. Locker rooms could also be unisex with enclosed single user changing spaces, and rules that keep you from changing outside of the changing room. That leaves no one out, and makes no special consideration for anyone. Now that, to me, would be equality.